Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronz
Still talking about Harper, why did he have to change his role so drastically, he basically became a deep reserve after becoming a total focal point his entire career.
|
I really have no idea how that transition happened (in mindset). I mean the guy was a legit 20+ ppg guy in the league and was a great player both in his Clippers and Cavs days and all of a sudden we see him playing the reliable ball distributor, what the hell? Then again he possibly started thinking that if you're gonna play in the L it might as well be for you to go all the way. Good on him though, he did pretty good for himself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chronz
I know you werent talking to me but, on my paper, the Pistons had more talent with Malone injured. I never really understood what on paper meant, but shouldnt it include a players availability and productiveness? Usually when I hear people talk about talented teams on paper, and they go on to mention the Clippers and Thornton, I cant help but think its mostly names, and not a players game that is understood.
|
On paper means how skilled each guy is from the starting five of a team individually and not taking into account at all how or if those players can click on the floor together. Like for example last season's Suns team was stacked with big name players but that team could barely play on a high level mainly because those players' games didn't complement each other.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kingsako32
Ron Ron's gonna wear the number 37, as a tribute to Michael Jackson, because Thriller was #1 for 37 weeks.
|
Now that's randomness at it's finest (not on your part, on Ron's one).