 |
 360 vs PS3 games comparison (pics + vids) |
|
|
|
|
4-time Funniest Member of the Year
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 22,651
Thanks: 1,382
Thanked 1,338 Times in 769 Posts
Location: Cali
|
360 vs PS3 games comparison (pics + vids) -
11-29-2006, 07:17 PM
http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager....=0&cId=3155393
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 1up.com
Blu-ray. The Cell Processor. The RSX graphics chip. The PS3 was supposed to be the most insanely advanced gaming machine ever created. It was supposed to be able to deliver visuals well beyond anything capable on console or PC. According to Sony, the next generation wasn't supposed to begin until PS3 arrived.
So why is it, then, that all these PS3 games look just the same as they do on the Xbox 360?
When the PS2 first launched, Sony demanded that all games on the system be enhanced visually over their rival platform counterparts. The PS2 represented the next generation of gaming, and software was required to support this notion. With the PS3, Sony seemingly has no such requirements, offering us only that it "expects and encourages publishers working on PS3 titles to take full advantage of the technology and features that PS3 provides." Well, encouraging may not be enough. And promises for better looking games in the future don't really cut it. The PS3 is here now, it costs an extra $200 (at minimum), and the visual difference is questionable.
Don't believe us? We put the PS3 lineup to the test. We captured images and video of several games and their Xbox 360 counterparts - using the same exact capture device, with same type of connection cables, running at the same exact resolutions. Now you tell us, are we just missing something or was the next generation here all along?
|
Interesting stuff. Compares 360 and PS3 multiplatform games side-by-side (video and pics). In the opinions of 1up, the people who voted, and myself... it looks like just about all the games look the same. Where's the jump in PS3's graphics (don't play the "PS3 just came out" game with me, they claimed "4D" while the 360 was "Xbox 1.5")... maybe 1 or 2 games look better (FN3 got the most votes for the PS3 version looking better, though most people still said they were the same), that's it.
Cmon Sony bring your A-game, or stop talkin sh it
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,447
Thanks: 51
Thanked 36 Times in 24 Posts
|
11-29-2006, 07:47 PM
in the long run the ps3's gonna look better cause the developers will learn to use the full potential of the ps3 (which is more than the 360)
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
4-time Funniest Member of the Year
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 22,651
Thanks: 1,382
Thanked 1,338 Times in 769 Posts
Location: Cali
|
11-29-2006, 08:00 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brock Lesnar
in the long run the ps3's gonna look better cause the developers will learn to use the full potential of the ps3 (which is more than the 360)
|
I'm skeptical about the "Cell" being "4D" and stuff, but I'm pissed about the 50GB or w/e space PS3 has.
But if you look at Blue Dragon for 360, I think it's using 3 discs. Obviously, that's fu ckin gay and the PS3 would use one, but it still proves that games don't have to sacrifice space since you can get multiple discs and use the space you need.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,019
Thanks: 40
Thanked 51 Times in 32 Posts
Location: Florida
|
11-29-2006, 08:40 PM
Thats because the ps3 just came out and the 360 has been out for a year. The Ps3 has loads of potential and the frame rate issues and graphics will improve greatly. Its hard to compare a year old system to a brand new one :/ The ps3 game developers need time to utilize the potential of the system.
So the graphics should greatly improve, and if they dont, then that would be sad
^Props to half HAVOC^
Last edited by tlo450; 11-29-2006 at 08:45 PM..
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
4-time Funniest Member of the Year
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 22,651
Thanks: 1,382
Thanked 1,338 Times in 769 Posts
Location: Cali
|
11-29-2006, 08:45 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tlo450
Thats because the ps3 just came out and the 360 has been out for a year. The Ps3 has loads of potential and the frame rate issues and graphics will improve greatly. Its hard to compare a year old system to a brand new one :/
|
Damn me writing all that in the first post only works if people read it...
Well I'm just saying from Sony's own mouth, if the PS3 was 4D and the 360 was an Xbox 1.5, then there should be no contest from launch, don't you think?
And also check the link. Ridge Racer 6 (360 launch) is being compared to RR7 (PS3 launch), and they look very similar. Full Auto is being compared to Full Autp 2, and still graphics look the same. How come when the 360 launched, its graphics could be just like those of the PS3's at launch, even though the PS3 is so advanced?
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,649
Thanks: 416
Thanked 414 Times in 272 Posts
Location: Totara Park BABY
|
11-29-2006, 09:19 PM
PS3's version just looks a bit brighter ..
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,389
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 3 Posts
Location: FL- Home of champs
|
11-29-2006, 09:28 PM
I have a qestion whats the ghost tree doing by the 360 screenshot? anyways They both look almost identical.
People defend consoles too hard. :lol: Pretty soon all consoles of the past are going to replace with emulators.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,569
Thanks: 358
Thanked 140 Times in 84 Posts
Location: Tdot
|
11-29-2006, 09:40 PM
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by yungflo
I have a qestion whats the ghost tree doing by the 360 screenshot? anyways They both look almost identical.
|
ROFL. thats what i was thinking.
When Halo 3 comes out, XBOX 360 completely owns the PS3 no matter how many good games PS3 comes out wit.
Vader
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fabolous
Being broke is a joke, i never found it funny, that's why i count my blessings as much as i count my money
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fabolous
Money can't buy you happiness, but its a damn good down payment
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
2-time Master Debator of the Year
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,381
Thanks: 244
Thanked 1,243 Times in 564 Posts
Location: aussie.
|
11-29-2006, 09:56 PM
1up.com are biased, and lacking in technological knowledge. Anyway, I don't want to get in a long winded explanation, but all I can say is that in 3 years, you'll see a difference. It won't be Xbox to PS2 difference, but it will be a difference.
And how the hell is anybody going to compare screenshots of a game by the absolute laziest developers on the market? EA = Horrible.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Habib
Football (SOCCER) is one of the dirtiest sports in the World you get beat up every match!
|
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 8,389
Thanks: 1
Thanked 9 Times in 3 Posts
Location: FL- Home of champs
|
11-29-2006, 10:06 PM
Yeah I agree 1up.com Is a bad source as well as Joystiq. They use user-submitted news. They check out the link and write a quick summary with out analyzing it.:lol:
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:43 PM.
|