You can move this thread if you want to

[G. Daddy~1~]

If you want our beloved mixmakers missing out on the difference between a great game and a less than suck game, then go you right ahead and moved the thread.

http://media.sports.ign.com/articles...93/vids_1.html

Smart AI, smooth, great graphic, and smart,...........

http://media.xbox360.ign.com/media/8...41/vids_1.html

dumb ai, horribly stupid ai, extremely idiotic ai, the motion is sickening. graphic decent.

[dragonkillerg]

1. links arent working
2. wat are u talkin about ?

[G. Daddy~1~]

Originally Posted by dragonkillerg

1. links arent working
2. wat are u talkin about ?

Sorry guys. It should work now.................

[dragonkillerg]

well i love the live series grew up playing it
Live series are the best on computer
while 2k series are best on the consoles
its just times like these some peopel are limited to playing 2k series and live series like me =\
dont have a console just have a pc thats why im a fan of live

[Chronz]

Your posting like a fool, you can judge gameplay by watchin 2 morons play eachother? GTF outta here with your nonsense. Im sure Eric Snow would pull up for a 3 with a hand in his face, much less make it.

Let the games comeout before you smash em, Live rules.

PS The cpu didnt even rotate on Mihm but Im guessing they are playing on rookie

[G. Daddy~1~]

Originally Posted by Chronz

Your posting like a fool, you can judge gameplay by watchin 2 morons play eachother? GTF outta here with your nonsense. Im sure Eric Snow would pull up for a 3 with a hand in his face, much less make it.

Let the games comeout before you smash em, Live rules.

PS The cpu didnt even rotate on Mihm but Im guessing they are playing on rookie

I'm posting like fool when you're the one that are saying Live rules......after you saw those vids.

You can say the 2k vids are not perfect, hey bud, it's just a game. But according to me and IGN, Lives is "years behind 2k."

again, the cavs was being conrol by a human user. The Lakers was being control by the computer. And look how they actually run plays, recognize open players inside and out, recognize open shots and take them. Look at how smooth the animation is. know to move around the court to the unoccupied spot, just like real. And can it be that Mihm is not a great shooter, which is why they did not rotate? Ah, it even recognizes that.

Live on the other hand, other than the slam dunk contest and the shoot out, the gameplay is sickening. And no, it wsa not two morons playing. Well, if you want to count the computer has a moron, which is perfectly fine, then yes, it was two morons playing it out.

[Fl0h4n]

Originally Posted by G. Daddy~1~

I'm posting like fool when you're the one that are saying Live rules......after you saw those vids.

You can say the 2k vids are not perfect, hey bud, it's just a game. But according to me and IGN, Lives is "years behind 2k."

again, the cavs was being conrol by a human user. The Lakers was being control by the computer. And look how they actually run plays, recognize open players inside and out, recognize open shots and take them. Look at how smooth the animation is. know to move around the court to the unoccupied spot, just like real. And can it be that Mihm is not a great shooter, which is why they did not rotate? Ah, it even recognizes that.

Live on the other hand, other than the slam dunk contest and the shoot out, the gameplay is sickening. And no, it wsa not two morons playing. Well, if you want to count the computer has a moron, which is perfectly fine, then yes, it was two morons playing it out.

Yeah you are so right!
Chronz take a look at the vid of Live called "Movement".
Just look at the animations of Live and compare them to 2k.
The animations of Live are worse then 2k's, just look at the dunks! The dunks are so ugly in Live and the player movements are ugly 2!
I find the graphics from Live to low for Next-gen Standards, but thats just my opionen
If next-gen Live was released for the PS2 i would say: "WOW this game looks awesome!"
But for the Xbox-360 standards it is more like: "Hmm graphically it isnt as nice then other games".
The only thing why im considering of buying Live is because the ESPN things they put in and the All-Star Weekend (but i must say that the slamdunk contest looks kinda weak).
If 2k puts it a All-star Weekend its over for Live because then they dont got anything special anymore...
So 2k wins the graphic part for me...
But its not all about the grapgics. Its about the gameplay 2!
Both games have great gameplay but different types of gameplay..
So its just what you like best.
If you like playing an arcade style of basketball, then Live is the game for you (if gameplay is the same as 06).
But if you like a more realistic type of basketball, 2k is the game for you.
My point is that it isnt all about the graphics! because would you buy a game with the sickest graphics ever, but the gameplay is the worsest ever??
I wouldn't!
The reason why i prefer 2k is because i like a more realistic type of gameplay..

And you CAN judge the games on their gameplay by seen 2 vids of it..
Because to me it looks just the same as last year and i have both games, so i know how they play...

Fl0h4n

[G. Daddy~1~]

Originally Posted by Fl0h4n

Yeah you are so right!
Chronz take a look at the vid of Live called "Movement".
Just look at the animations of Live and compare them to 2k.
The animations of Live are worse then 2k's, just look at the dunks! The dunks are so ugly in Live and the player movements are ugly 2!
I find the graphics from Live to low for Next-gen Standards, but thats just my opionen
If next-gen Live was released for the PS2 i would say: "WOW this game looks awesome!"
But for the Xbox-360 standards it is more like: "Hmm graphically it isnt as nice then other games".
The only thing why im considering of buying Live is because the ESPN things they put in and the All-Star Weekend (but i must say that the slamdunk contest looks kinda weak).
If 2k puts it a All-star Weekend its over for Live because then they dont got anything special anymore...
So 2k wins the graphic part for me...
But its not all about the grapgics. Its about the gameplay 2!
Both games have great gameplay but different types of gameplay..
So its just what you like best.
If you like playing an arcade style of basketball, then Live is the game for you (if gameplay is the same as 06).
But if you like a more realistic type of basketball, 2k is the game for you.
My point is that it isnt all about the graphics! because would you buy a game with the sickest graphics ever, but the gameplay is the worsest ever??
I wouldn't!
The reason why i prefer 2k is because i like a more realistic type of gameplay..

And you CAN judge the games on their gameplay by seen 2 vids of it..
Because to me it looks just the same as last year and i have both games, so i know how they play...

Fl0h4n

]

Yea, I just do not get 2k. I mean, the main reason live out sell 2k is because of that allstar weeken that attracts alot of average gamers, and the fact that it is EA sports. I'm telling y'all, if 2k puts in the allstar weeken, then it will ko Live once and for all.

[Fl0h4n]

Originally Posted by G. Daddy~1~

]

Yea, I just do not get 2k. I mean, the main reason live out sell 2k is because of that allstar weeken that attracts alot of average gamers, and the fact that it is EA sports. I'm telling y'all, if 2k puts in the allstar weeken, then it will ko Live once and for all.

Yeah just like i said
Graphically Live is nothing compared to 2k, but a lot off people are still promoting Live like its the sickest looking basketball out there but thats bull****!
Every noob can see that 2k looks 5 times better then Live!

Fl0h4n

[kobebdaman]

hell no you CANT judge gameplay by lookin at caps, you have to actually play the game to judge its gameplay. And no matter what 2K does it wont outsell Live. they dropped the game to 20 bucks and it still couldnt do it.

Graphics wise 2k is better, but when it comes to gameplay Live is just too smooth you have complete player control that 2k lacks even though theyve refined their controlls to make it play more like Live.

Originally Posted by G. Daddy~1~

I'm posting like fool when you're the one that are saying Live rules......after you saw those vids.

You can say the 2k vids are not perfect, hey bud, it's just a game. But according to me and IGN, Lives is "years behind 2k."

again, the cavs was being conrol by a human user. The Lakers was being control by the computer. And look how they actually run plays, recognize open players inside and out, recognize open shots and take them. Look at how smooth the animation is. know to move around the court to the unoccupied spot, just like real. And can it be that Mihm is not a great shooter, which is why they did not rotate? Ah, it even recognizes that.

Live on the other hand, other than the slam dunk contest and the shoot out, the gameplay is sickening. And no, it wsa not two morons playing. Well, if you want to count the computer has a moron, which is perfectly fine, then yes, it was two morons playing it out.

No man it was some morons playing, why would the computer jump out of bounds, whoever was playing 2k was actually running plays, the guy playin live was a total idiot

PS Mihm has that shot, if you think hes not worthy of rotating against then I shouldnt give a damn about your oppinion on basketball