[Ynusgridorh]

Nash and Paul are equally good offensively but Paul is a much better defender. So Paul is better.

[panmits41]

nash of course.
paul is only in his first great year.

[Billy32]

Originally Posted by Ynusgridorh

Nash and Paul are equally good offensively but Paul is a much better defender. So Paul is better.

Don't overrate Chris Pauls defense, its average but not great. Call me biased but I would go with Nash because he is a great shooter, ball handler and distributor and comes up in clutch situations but as others have said in a few years Chris Paul and Deron Williams will be the top PG's of the league.

[X_factor]

Paul, because Nash's time has passed, and Chris' time has just begun.

[pgvictory21]

paul > nash, he can dunk haha

[YungAI]

Originally Posted by pgvictory21

paul > nash, he can dunk haha

So can Nash.
Im going with Nash
Nash has way better highlights too

[tmac_for_MVP]

Originally Posted by YungAI

MVP or No MVP?
MVP
Lotta fortune tellers in here.

Are you an idiot, that is totally irrevelant because Nash got his MVPs in his prime, near being 30 years old, CP3 is fukkin young and has plenty of time for that. When at his age Nash was nothing compared to CP3.

Now, even then, their offensive abilities being about equal, CP3's defense put him over Nash as Nash never ever had any defensive ability but drawing charge, something CP3 can do just as well.

[Blizzard22]

I'll take Paul without even having to think. He is the future #1 pg in the nba for years to come.

[YungAI]

Originally Posted by tmac_for_MVP

Are you an idiot, that is totally irrevelant because Nash got his MVPs in his prime, near being 30 years old, CP3 is fukkin young and has plenty of time for that. When at his age Nash was nothing compared to CP3.

Now, even then, their offensive abilities being about equal, CP3's defense put him over Nash as Nash never ever had any defensive ability but drawing charge, something CP3 can do just as well.

No you're and idiot
MVP stands for Most Valuable Player
your saying Nash got MVP in his prime
it was 2 years ago and Chris Paul has plenty of time?
How the **** is 2 years irrelevant but Chris Paul having plenty of time is relevant?

[JOBRO231523]

Paul is more of an all around player